Category: Science Fiction

The Spark Blogfest

The Spark Blogfest

This is hosted by Christine Tyler, in which the Spark Blogfest asks three key questions about inspiration. (I love the word ‘doomed’ in the first question!)

1. What book made you realize you were doomed to be a writer? 

There was no specific text that acted as a knell or an augury because I was only six years old. But I had a teacher who would read out some Roald Dahl to keep us occupied, and during those sessions I discovered that stories trump television every time. In school anything I wrote in English Composition class would end up displayed on the school’s Open Day noticeboard or get sent to the principal, and I’d panic because I thought I’d done something wrong. Now I realize I was doing something very right.

When I was sixteen I picked up an excellent Icon guide to Franz Kafka and decided to try The Metamorphosis and The Trial. These two works demonstrated that fiction is an instant passport to another person’s headspace and the immense skill required of a writer to draw the reader in. Inception? Fight Club? Contemporary cinematic nightmares in a damaged brain are nothing compared to Gregor Samsa’s and Josef K’s ordeals.

2. What author set off that spark of inspiration for your current Work in Progress?

I have a few WIPS with a spec fic bent. I always return to Aldous Huxley, H.G Wells and Arthur C.Clarke. All writers who saw so far into the future that the present is still catching up with their predictions. “How did they know?” I used to wonder at their extrapolations, although judging from the state of the early 21st century, the question is now, “How could they not have known?!”

3. Is there a book or author that changed your world view?

All books and writers invariably change your perception in varying degrees, if we’re going with the more encompassing interpretation of world view (weltanschauung).

90534045

Dystopia Myopia

World-building. A prerequisite for any spec-fic writer. Yes, I’m talking to you – are you up to the challenge of constructing your own brave new world? Or will it collapse like a house of invalid ID cards?

Dystopias are popular and viewed as an anthropological, social and cultural sci-fi. When compared to constructing alien races and cultures, planets and languages, dystopias appear easy to create. After all, just imagine a future similar to the present but more shite.

Dystopias are tricky to write in the sense that there is insufficient distance from the present. 1984 has passed 1984 and Brave New World’s prescience reverberates with hindsight. But there is no need to be a prophet- your task is more like a cartographer. Know your territory well and be prepared that the terrain may radically transform during the course of writing.

Also, think of your favourite cinematic dystopias (Blade Runner, Gatacca, THX 1138, Logan’s Run). It doesn’t matter how shite your future is , it has to be cool, stylish, or OTT (The Road Warrior) enough to engage your reader. Yet unlike film, oodles of style cannot compensate for your utopia’s lack of substance. Equilibrium (2002) looked ultra-fantastic; Christian Bale dressed in severe dog-collared suits and doing a nifty fictional martial arts called gun-kata. But all the visuals could not hide the flawed and implausible plot about a totalitarian government’s attempt to police emotions.

Something has to be unfair. Extremely unfair. The authorities have imposed upon society severe restrictions and laws. They deem forbidden something that we take for granted. Books (Farenheit 451) love, art, beauty, women’s rights (The Handmaid’s Tale). But bear in mind that what is unfair is subjective. If you can’t stand kids then Aldous Huxley’s vision of bottle-reared babies may sound amusing. If you aren’t interested in books (if so, what the hell are you doing reading this blog?!) Farenheit 451 may not ruffle your feathers. Perhaps a surveillance state is preferable to an anarchic one?

But consider that we all fear the misuse and abuse of power, and also consider that there are people who will gladly give up some freedoms to gain other types of freedoms.  The real question that dystopic fiction asks is, “What are you willing to tolerate?”

The Hardest 1000 Words of My Career (so far….)

People have lauded me for this article, which I acknowledge with heartfelt thanks. But writing this article was *hard* and I mean ‘constipated-with-no-access-to-prunes-and-enemas’ type of hard.

No facetiousness intended; that scatological reference is just to purely express my relief (no pun intended too….) at a job well done .

Enjoy reading it…

The Rough Guide to Modern Malaysian Science Fiction and Fantasy 

Cover image for 'The Complete Short Stories'

Images of Gorgeous Desolation: Reading J.G Ballard

Steven Spielberg’s 1987 film adaptation of Empire of the Sun brought JG Ballard to my notice. After watching the film I sought out the original source novel and tried to read it, thinking rather naively that it’d be easy young adult read because the protagonist Jim, is ten years old. After vivid nightmarish descriptions of a ruined Shanghai and a street urchin’s memorable refrain of, ‘No momma, no papa, no whisky soda!’ I put the book down because it was beyond my ten year old reading capabilities. It was too complex, but I promised myself that I’d return to Ballard when I was older.

Ten years later one of the tutors on my 20th Century literature module assigned the aptly named Crash as a text for class discussion- which was disastrous. The class coincided with the release of David Cronenberg’s controversial film version and I recall two of the students, a pair of middle-aged ladies fuming at the choice of reading text and the content because both were emergency ward nurses and they were outraged at the fetishistic nature of Crash . My tutor seemed to delight in this provocation while I kept expressing that the film version is more graphic than the novel and that the class had trouble separating film adaptation from novel.

“You actually saw the film?” one of the nurses gawped at me as if I was a twisted pervert.

“Twice.” I replied, deliberately excused myself from class and walked past both nurses with an affected limp. I didn’t go back to class; instead I sat in the campus cafe and marveled at the power of literature to challenge and provoke.

Nowadays, in reading and rereading Ballard I’m astounded at his genius in creating scenes of desolate beauty and exoticism. Although there are shocking elements in works as The Atrocity Exhibition, even in Crash beauty is present in bleak sterility; ’For half an hour I sat by the window…looking down at the hundreds of cars in the parking lot. Their roofs formed a lake of metal.’ Here’s another gem (no pun intended)  from The Crystal World: ‘On a lawn of green glass spurs a child’s tricycle glittered like a Faberge gem, the wheels starred into brilliant jasper crowns.” Finally here is my personal favourite from The Day of Creation: ‘Signal flares were falling from the air, like  discarded pieces of the sun.’ 

Nicolas Shakespeare’s review of  Ballard’s memoir Miracles of Life: From Shanghai to Shepperton offers some insight into Ballard’s writing headspace:

“What most excites (Ballard’s) imagination are the shells of his native city: a drained swimming pool, a friend’s gutted house, a bombed-out casino – “more real and more meaningful” as empty and ruined than when thronged with gamblers, and giving Ballard a sense of precariousness he never lost: “that reality itself was a stage set that could be dismantled at any moment”. In Ballard’s fiction, the more ruined and desolate the setting, the more beautiful and haunting the images. Like Borges, the most surreal Ballardian tale is anchored by a core of profund truth.

Finally, I still love space operas and other conventional science-fiction forms but reading Ballard’s essay ‘Which Way to Inner Space?’ provided me with an alternative compass for writing science-fiction. According to Ballard, space fiction can no longer provide the ‘main wellspring of ideas for sci-fi’ because it is becoming increasingly dated and the stuff of science fiction is now becoming science fact . Ballard suggests that sci-fi turn its back on aliens, outer space etc…and become more literary and metaphysical in its ideas and approach. “It is the inner space-suit that is needed and it is up to science fiction to build it!”

red_dumpster_bin_tagged_free

Info Skip

Speculative fiction is full of info dumps – a conscise summation of the world for the reader.

However, in writing spec fic there is such a thing as too much information. Yes, you want to immerse readers in your world but totally suffocate them. Little niggling details are not necessary, such as the following:

1. Toilet Habits

Skip these unless its really essential to the plot and narrative thrust. How does your alien being excrete? (Note: *all* living organisms that respire must excrete…) Not even as a joke – remember the three seashells in the water closet in the 1993 Stallone movie, ‘Demolition Man’? I never got that gag and still don’t.

2. Food

I’m not saying exclude food. But the food item/s must be special and add to plot dynamics. Like the geriatric spice drug  in Frank Herbert’s Dune and please avoid a Soylent Green-type revelation. We all know what it is by now.

20 great infodumps are listed below at Io9:

http://io9.com/5481558/20-great-infodumps-from-science-fiction-novels

science_fiction01

Why I Write Science-Fiction

Snobbery is invariable. Food is not immune to it – look at wine-tasting, cigar-smoking, and gastro-gourmets. Alas, snobbery afflicts the realm of letters.

Does this snobbery lead back to those early formative years, when you did not want to be seen hanging around with a certain group of people? Or by extension, reading a certain genre? I’ve encountered resistance to science-fiction in media forms and most of it has the same ring of, ‘SF is for nerds/geeks/weirdos’, and from female readers, some say that SF is for males by males. Apparently, the SF by ladies is full of feminist diatribe. Perhaps I don’t blame all the eye-rolling I get when I say that I’m writing science-fiction.

I know there is appalling SF, but awfulness exists in every genre. Don’t let the few ruin the multitude. For every shining example there are a million rip-offs, but white dwarfs, black holes, nebulas and dying red giants are part of the grand scheme too. As a genre, SF is infinitely expansive so there’ll always be room.